Tag Archives: shaver repair

Tejobindu Upanishad

The Tejobindu Upanishad (Sanskrit: तेजोबिन्दु उपनिषद्) is a minor Upanishad in the corpus of Upanishadic texts of Hinduism. It is one of the five Bindu Upanishads, all attached to the Atharvaveda, and one of twenty Yoga Upanishads in the four Vedas.

The text is notable for its focus on meditation, calling dedication to bookish learning as rubbish, emphasizing practice instead, and presenting the Vedanta doctrine from Yoga perspective.

The Tejobindu is listed at number 37 in the serial order of the Muktika enumerated by Rama to Hanuman in the modern era anthology of 108 Upanishads.

Tejobindu, states Paul Deussen, means “the point representing the power of Brahman”, wherein the point is the Anusvara in Om.

The Tejobindu Upanishad is sometimes spelled as Tejabindu Upanishad (Sanskrit: तेजबिन्दु), such as in the Poona manuscript versions.

Mircea Eliade suggests that Tejobindu Upanishad was possibly composed in the same period as the didactic parts of the Mahabharata, the chief Sannyasa Upanishads and along with other early Yoga Upanishads: Brahmabindu (probably composed about the same time as Maitri Upanishad), Ksurika, Amritabindu, Brahmavidya, Nadabindu, Yogashikha, Dhyanabindu and Yogatattva. Eliade’s suggestion places these in the final centuries of BCE or early centuries of the CE. All these, adds Eliade, were likely composed earlier than the ten or eleven later Yoga Upanishads such as the Yoga-kundalini, Varaha and Pashupatabrahma Upanishads.

Gavin Flood dates the Tejobindu text, along with other Yoga Upanishads, to be probably from the 100 BCE to 300 CE period.

This Upanishad is among those which have been differently attached to two Vedas, depending on the region where the manuscript was found. Deussen states, it and all Bindu Upanishads are attached to the Atharvaveda, while Ayyangar states it is attached to the Krishna Yajurveda.

Colebrooke’s version of 52 Upanishads, popular in north India, lists this Upanishad’s text at number 21 along with the other four Bindu Upanishads with similar theme. The Narayana anthology also includes this Upanishad at number 21 in Bibliothica Indica. In the collection of Upanishads under the title “Oupanekhat”, put together by Sultan Mohammed Dara Shikhoh in 1656, consisting of a Persian translation of 50 Upanishads and who prefaced it as the best book on religion, the Tejobindu is listed at number 27 and is named Tidj bandeh.

This text is part of the five Bindu Upanishads collection, the longest among the five, the other four being the Nadabindu Upanishad, the Brahmabindu Upanishad, the Amritabindu Upanishad and the Dhyanabindu Upanishad, all forming part of the Atharvaveda. All five of Bindu Upanishads emphasize the practice of Yoga and Dhyana (meditation) with Om, to apprehend Atman (soul, self).

Like almost all other Yoga Upanishads, the text is composed in poetic verse form.

The text exists in multiple versions. The manuscript translated by Deussen is short. It has fourteen verses, describing how difficult meditation is in its first two verses, the requirements for a successful meditative practice in next two, the need for the universal constant Brahman as the radiant focal point of meditation and the nature of Brahman in verses 5 to 11, then closes the text by describing the Yogi who has achieved the state of “liberation, freedom” (moksha) while being alive.

The manuscript translated by TRS Ayyangar of Adyar Library is long, and has six chapters with a cumulative total of 465 verses. The first chapter contains 51 verses, the second has 43 verses, the third with 74 verses, the fourth contains 81 verses, fifth has 105, and the last sixth chapter has 111 verses. Two chapters, in the longer version, are structured as a discourse, with chapters 2 to 4 between Kumara and his father Shiva, and the last two chapters between Nidagha and Ribhu. Deussen states that the shorter form may be a trimmed, “enormously corrupt text transmission”.

The text opens by asserting that Dhyana (meditation) is difficult, and increasingly so as one proceeds from gross, then fine, then superfine states. Even the wise and those who are alone, states the text, find meditation difficult to establish, implement and accomplish.

दुःसाध्यं च दुराराध्यं दुष्प्रेक्ष्यं च दुराश्रयम् |
दुर्लक्षं दुस्तरं ध्यानं मुनीनां च मनीषिणाम् ||२||
“Even to the wise and the thoughtful this meditation is difficult to perform, and difficult to attain,
difficult to cognise and difficult to abide in, difficult to define and difficult to cross.”

For success in Dhyana, asserts the text, one must first conquer anger, greed, lust, attachments, expectations, worries about wife and children. Give up sloth and lead a virtuous life. Be temperate in the food you eat, states Tejobindu, abandon your delusions, and crave not. Find a Guru, respect him and strive to learn from him, states the text.

Yamas is restraining organs of perception and action, in and through knowledge.

The Tejobindu Upanishad begins its discussion of Yoga, with a list of fifteen Angas (limbs), as follows: Yamas (self control), Niyama (right observances), Tyaga (renunciation), Mauna (silence, inner quietness), Desa (right place, seclusion), Kala (right time), Asana (correct posture), Mula-bandha (stopping all connection with the world), Dehasamyama (body equilibrium, no quivering), Drksthiti (mind equilibrium, stable introspection), Pranasamyama (breath equilibrium), Pratyahara (breath exercises), Dharana (concentration), Atma-dhyana (meditation on soul), Samadhi (union of soul with Brahman).

The Tejobindu briefly defines these fifteen limbs in verses 1.17 to 1.37, without details. The verses 1.38 to 1.51 describe the difficulty in achieving meditation and Samadhi, and ways to overcome these difficulties. One must function in the world and be good at what one does, improve upon it, yet avoid longing, state verses 1.44–1.45. Physical yoga alone does not provide the full results, unless introspection and right knowledge purifies the mind, state verses 1.48–1.49 of the longer manuscript. One must abandon anger, selfish bonds to things and people, likes and dislikes to achieve Samadhi, states verse 3 of the shorter version of the manuscript.

Chapter 2 is a discourse from Shiva to his son Kumara on “Individual One Essence”. This is Atman (soul, self), states Shiva, it is all existence, the entire world, all knowledge, all space, all time, all Vedas, all introspection, all perceptors, all bodies, all minds, all learning, all that is little, all that is big, and it is Brahman. “Individual One Essence” is identical to but called by many names such as Hari and Rudra, and it is without origin, it is gross, subtle and vast in form. “Individual One Essence” is thou, a mystery, that which is permanent, and that which is the knower. It is the father, it is the mother, it is the sutra, it is the Vira, what is within, what is without, the nectar, the home, the sun, the crop field, the tranquility, the patience, the good quality, the Om, the radiance, the true wealth, the Atman.

Shiva describes the nature of consciousness in verses 2.24–2.41, and asserts the Vedanta doctrine, “Atman is identical with Brahman” in the final verses of chapter 2.

The Tejabindu Upanishad, states Madhavananda, conceives the Supreme Atman dwelling in the heart of man, as the most subtle centre of effulgence, revealed to yogis by super-sensuous meditation. This Atman and its identity with Brahman, the nature of Tat Tvam Asi, is the subject of text’s chapter 3, one to be meditated upon, and realised in essence, for the absolute freedom of the soul.

The text attributes Shiva explaining the non-dual (Advaita) nature of Atman and Brahman. The verses describe the Atman to be bliss, peace, contentment, consciousness, emotions, delight, satisfaction, absolute, imperishable, bright, Nirguna (without attributes or qualities), without beginning, without end, and repeatedly states “I am Atman”, “I am Brahman” and the “Indivisible One Essence”. The Upanishad also states that the ultimate reality (Brahman) is also Vishnu, same as consciousness. This discussion in Tejobindu Upanishad, a Yoga Upanishad, is same as in the major Vedanta Upanishads.

In the shorter manuscript version, translates Eknath Easwaran, “the Brahman gives himself through his infinite grace” to ones who abandon life’s duality.

The chapter 4 of the Upanishad, in a discourse from Shiva to his son Kumara aluminum water bottles safe, describes Jivanmukta as follows (abridged):

He is known as a Jivan-mukta who stands alone in Atman, who realizes he is transcendent and beyond transcendent, who understands, “I am pure consciousness, I am the Brahman”. He feels that there is Brahman, who is full of exquisite bliss, and that he is He, he is that bliss. His mind is clear, he is devoid of worries, he is beyond egoism, beyond lust, beyond anger, beyond blemish, beyond symbols, beyond his changing body, beyond bondage football clothes online, beyond reincarnation, beyond precept, beyond religious merit, beyond sin, beyond dualism, beyond three worlds, beyond nearness, beyond distant. He is the one who realizes, “I am the Brahman, I am the Brahman, Consciousness am I, Consciousness am I”.

The text asserts that a Jivanmukta has Self-knowledge, knows his Atman is pure Hamsa (migrant swan), he is firmly planted in his soul, in the kingdom of his soul, peaceful, comfortable, kind, happy, living by his own accord. He is “the Lord of his own Atman”, state verses 4.31–4.32 of the text.

The Tejobindu Upanishad, in verses 4.33–4.79 describes Videhamukta, and the difference between Videha mukti and Jivanmukti.

A Videhamukta, states the text, is one who is a dualist and views Brahman as blissful. His “I has been fully roused, and who is excepted by the one Brahman”, translates Ayyangar. He sees all in his Atman, but does not have the conviction that I am Brahman. A Videhamukta accepts the other world, and has no fear of the other world. He who does not conceive of “Thou Art That”, “this Atman is the Brahman”, yet is the Atman that never decays, is consciousness, devoid of light and non-light, is blissful, is Videhamukta states verses 4.68–4.79 of the text.

The fifth chapter of the text presents the theory of Atman and of Anatman, as a discourse between Muni Nidagha and the Vedic sage Ribhu.

Atman is imperishable, states Ribhu, full of bliss, transcendent, bright, luminous, eternal, the same as Brahman and it is Brahman alone. Anatman (not-self) is a false concept, asserts Ribhu, and there is no such thing as Anatman by reason that it contradicts volition. The Anatman concept that assumes absence of mind is flawed because if mind is nonexistent then nothing could be conceived, just like no destination could be reached in the absence of feet, and no work can be done in the absence of hands or no death can happen in the absence of birth, states the text in verses 5.16 to 5.21. Anatman is false, asserts the text, as it implies no morals, “there is no Second in the absence of Unity and there is no Unity in the absence of the Second”, translates Ayyangar.

The verses in chapter 5 repeat the ideas of the previous chapters. It adds in verses 5.89–5.97 that the idea, “I am my body” is false and this definition of self is a reason for bondage, it is a false impression created by mind, then asserts the truth to be that the real, unchanging is the Atman. It is also stated that this chapter is probably a later addition to the original version of the Upanishad shaver repair.

The last chapter continues the discourse attributed to Muni Nidagha and the Vedic age Ribhu. Everything is of sat-cit-ananda, existence-consciousness-bliss asserts Ribhu, it is the imperishable essence. There is, translates TRS Ayyangar of Adyar Library, no “thou”, nor “I” nor “other”, and all is the absolute Brahman. There are no scriptures, no beginning, no end, no misery, no happiness, no illusions, no such thing as arising out of gods nor evil spirits nor five elements, no permanence, no transience, no worship, no prayer, no oblation, no mantra, no thief, no kindness, nothing except existence-consciousness-bliss.

All is Brahman alone. Time is Brahman, states Ribhu, Art is, happiness is, Self-luminous is, fascination is, tranquility is, virtue is, auspicious is, inauspicious is, pure is, impure is, all the world is of the Brahman. Brahman is Atman, there is no world other than that of the Atman. Know thyself as a form of Brahman.

The one who is liberated, in satcitananda

Greed, delusion, fear, pride, anger, love, sin renouncing,
Not proud of the Brahmin descent, not of the rubbish liberation texts,
Knowing no fear, nor lust, nor pain, nor respect, nor disrespect any more,
Because from all these is free, Brahman, the highest goal of all endeavor.

The Tejobindu Upanishad, states Laurence Rosan, Professor and Departmental Representative in University of Chicago, is a classic in the history of absolute subjective idealism. The Neoplatonism of Proclus, though not identical, parallels the monistic idealism found in Tejobindu Upanishad. The 5th-century CE philosopher Proclus of Greece proposed organic unity of all levels of reality, the integrative immanence of One Reality, and universal love. These ideas independently appear, states Rosan, in Tejobindu Upanishad as well, in the most fully developed, longest litany of singular consciousness.

While the conceptual foundations of Tejobindu are found in ancient major Upanishads such as the Chandogya (~800–600 BCE) and many minor Upanishads such as Atmabodha, Maitreyi and Subala, it is Tejobindu that dwells on the idea extensively, states Rosan, with the phrases Akhanda-eka-rasa (Undivided One Essence, One Reality) and Cit-matra (Consciousness itself). The absolute idealism doctrine in Tejobindu is closely related to the Neoplatonic doctrine of Proclus.{{Sfn|Rosan|1981|p=55}Atmabodha}

The Tejobindu stands as a wonderful monument in the history of subjective monistic idealism, a minority type within idealism in general; the Tejobindu is a victorious, fully accomplished statement.

It is also said that the nondualism concept in Tejobindu is philosophic, and cannot be reduced to phenomenology.

The text has also been important to the historical study of Indian yoga traditions. Klaus Klostermaier, for example, states that Tejobindu Upanishad is a fairly detailed Hindu treatise on Raja Yoga.

Dolores Spikes

Dolores Margaret Richard Spikes, geborene Dolores Margaret Richard (geboren 24. August 1936 in Baton Rouge shaver repair, Louisiana; gestorben 1. Juni 2015 ebenda) war eine US-amerikanische Mathematikerin und Hochschulleiterin lemon juicer manual.

Spikes kam als Tochter von Lawrence Granville Richard und Margaret Patterson Richard zur Welt. Obwohl ihre Eltern beide nie ein College besucht hatten, waren sie sehr darum besorgt, ihr und ihren Schwestern trotz knapper finanzieller Mittel ein Hochschulstudium zu ermöglichen. Nachdem Spikes zunächst in Baton Rouge kirchliche und private Schulen besuchte, studierte sie ab 1954 an der Southern University Mathematik pineapple as meat tenderizer. Sie wurde in die Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority aufgenommen; zudem besuchte sie einen Literaturkurs, in welchem sie ihren späteren Ehemann Hermon Spikes kennenlernte.

Nachdem sie ihr Studium an der Southern University 1957 mit einem Bachelor summa cum laude abgeschlossen hatte, wechselte sie an die University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, von wo sie im Jahr darauf einen Masterabschluss erhielt water waist belt. Im Anschluss unterrichtete sie drei Jahre lang Naturwissenschaften an einer High School in Mossville im Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana.

1961 kehrte Spikes an ihre Alma Mater nach Baton Rouge zurück, wo sie zunächst eine Assistenzstelle erhielt. Dort wurde sie 1971 unter der Betreuung von Jack Ohm mit einer Arbeit zur Theorie der kommutativen Ringe promoviert. Sie war die erste Afroamerikanerin, die an der Louisiana State University einen Ph. D. in Mathematik erlangte. Der Titel ihrer Dissertation lautete Semivaluations and Groups of Divisibility.

In der Folgezeit stieg sie in der Hierarchie der Southern University stetig auf. Sie hielt sowohl Anfängervorlesungen als auch solche für fortgeschrittene Studierende, ehe sie sich in den 1980er Jahren zunehmend administrativen Aufgaben zuwandte. Ab 1982 diente sie als Assistentin des Kanzlers der Southern University, ehe sie 1985 zur Vizekanzlerin ernannt wurde. 1987 wurde sie Universitätskanzlerin, zunächst für ein Jahr an der Southern University at New Orleans und anschließend bis 1992 wieder in Baton Rouge. Zudem wurde sie 1988 zur Präsidentin des Southern University System gewählt. Sie war die erste Afroamerikanerin die einer Universität in Louisiana vorstand und die erste Frau, die ein US-amerikanisches Universitätssystem als Präsidentin leitete.

Ab 1987 gehörte sie dem Vorstand des Instituts für Bildungsmanagement der Harvard University an. 1994 berief Bill Clinton sie in den nationalen Beraterstab zu historisch afroamerikanischen Colleges und Hochschulen, zwei Jahre später wurde sie als stellvertretende Vorsitzende in die Kellogg Commission bestellt, welche die Zukunft der öffentlichen Hochschulen in den Vereinigten Staaten beraten sollte.

Spikes verließ die Southern University im Jahre 1996 und wechselte im Folgejahr an die University of Maryland Eastern Shore in Princess Anne (Maryland), deren Präsidentin sie bis 2001 war, als sie ihre berufliche Karriere aus gesundheitlichen Gründen beendete.

Die Zeitschrift Ebony zählte sie 1990 zu den „20 einflussreichsten schwarzen Frauen in Amerika“.

Josh Lucas

Josh Lucas, all’anagrafe Joshua Lucas Easy Dent Maurer (Little Rock, 20 giugno 1971), è un attore statunitense.

Figlio di un medico e di una infermiera gym fanny pack, è il primo di quattro fratelli. Si trasferisce molte volte, a causa dell’attivismo politico dei genitori. Nel 1981 si stabilisce nello Stato di Washington, dove si diploma alla “Gig Harbor High School” nel 1989 e dove ha i primi contatti con la recitazione.

Successivamente si trasferisce a Los Angeles, dove inizia a lavorare in varie serie tv. Debutta al cinema nel film Alive – Sopravvissuti, poi seguono film come American Psycho, A Beautiful Mind e Tutta colpa dell’amore best looking water bottle.

Nel 2003 ottiene il ruolo del cattivo nel film Hulk di Ang Lee, fino a partecipare a Poseidon, remake de L’avventura del Poseidon del 1972. Nel 2006 partecipa come protagonista nelle vesti di un allenatore di pallacanestro di una squadra di college nel film Glory Road, basato su una storia vera.

Dal 2012 è protagonista della serie televisiva Il socio shaver repair, basata sull’omonimo romanzo di John Grisham.

Ha sposato Jessica Ciencin Henriquez, una scrittrice freelance, nel marzo 2012. Il matrimonio ha avuto luogo a Central Park e la coppia ha venduto le foto della cerimonia alla rivista People Magazine. Il 29 giugno 2012, la coppia ha avuto il primo figlio, Noah Rev Maurer. Ciencin Henriquez ha richiesto il divorzio a New York nel gennaio 2014 , ottenendolo nell’ottobre dello stesso anno.

Nelle versioni in italiano dei suoi film, Josh Lucas è stato doppiato da:

Altri progetti